mldonkey, a multi-networks file-sharing client - Bugs: bug #12471, Add ToS support
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #12471: Add ToS support
Submitter: | Mark Schreiber <mark7> | ||
Submitted: | Sat 26 Mar 2005 08:19:13 PM UTC | ||
Category: | Core | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Item Group: | Feature request | Status: | Fixed |
Assigned to: | None | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Release: | None | Release: | |
Operating System: | None | Binaries Origin: | None |
CPU type: | None |
Jump to the original submission
Sun 17 Jul 2005 05:26:53 PM UTC, comment #11: |
Anonymous |
Sat 16 Jul 2005 03:25:55 AM UTC, comment #10: Ugh...I'm moving, spiral, and OSS is being pushed down to the bottom of my priority list, but post-move I actually have to write something to do this for multiple computers anyway, so I can stick that up. Sorry for the delay on all this -- a move, a camping trip, and some other things have just kind of made weekends tight up here.
|
Mark Schreiber <mark7> |
Sat 25 Jun 2005 12:34:42 AM UTC, comment #9: See patch #4127
|
spiralvoice <spiralvoice> |
Mon 06 Jun 2005 07:13:31 AM UTC, comment #8: at this savannah bug webpage look at attached files at the bottom |
Anonymous |
Sat 04 Jun 2005 11:43:03 PM UTC, comment #7: Ethereal lists the field as part of the DSCP field, which is correct according to the latest RFCs. Technically, newer RFCs have turned the "ToS" fields into "DSCP". However, the RFCs also recommend that DSCP behavior be backwards compatible with ToS (especially since the only end-user applications that use the bits use them in ToS fashion).
|
Mark Schreiber <mark7> |
Sat 04 Jun 2005 10:10:54 AM UTC, comment #6: according to ethereal the patch isnt working as the tos field is missing |
Anonymous |
Tue 31 May 2005 08:32:36 AM UTC, comment #5: some way to test if it works properly is needed, but it definetly compiles and runs |
Anonymous |
Mon 30 May 2005 09:17:39 PM UTC, comment #4: 2iptos.patch1 compiles, any news about it? |
spiralvoice <spiralvoice> |
Sun 22 May 2005 04:24:34 PM UTC, comment #3: patch fails to compile |
Anonymous |
Sun 22 May 2005 04:21:09 PM UTC, comment #2: modified patch 572 with advice from pango
|
Anonymous |
Tue 19 Apr 2005 03:20:55 AM UTC, comment #1: The last line should read "--set-tos Maximize-Throughput", not "--set-tos Maximize-Throughpu" |
Mark Schreiber <mark7> |
Sat 26 Mar 2005 08:19:13 PM UTC, original submission:
IP provides a mechanism for flagging packets as Maximize-Throughput (bulk) or Minimize-Latency (interactive). If applications that "soak up extra bandwidth" flag their packets as bulk, it can be extremely useful for bandwidth allocation on residential ADSL or cable routers, and allow users to run P2P 24/7 using all available extra bandwidth -- web browsing and the like is not affected by P2P use.
|
Mark Schreiber <mark7> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 5 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005-07-08 | spiralvoice | Status | None | Fixed | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2005-05-23 | None | Attached File | - | Added 2iptos.patch1, #2535 | |
2005-05-22 | None | Attached File | - | Added tos.patch, #2531 | |
2005-04-18 | spiralvoice | Privacy | Private | Public |
Powered by Savane 3.13-3230.
Corresponding source code
The DSCP field value assigned to the packets is 0x02, which Ethereal states as unknown. Isn't it 0x08, the scavenger flag?