MHonArc - Bugs: bug #19627, PDF/DOC Mail Attachments from Macs...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #19627: PDF/DOC Mail Attachments from Macs get archived as .bin
Submitter: | Simon Eves <simoneves> | ||
Submitted: | Wed 18 Apr 2007 11:53:42 AM UTC | ||
Category: | MIME Filter | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Priority: | 5 - Normal | Item Group: | Undesired Behavior |
Status: | Invalid | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Operating System: | Linux | Perl Version: | 5.8.4 |
Component Version: | 2.6.15 | Fixed Release: |
Tue 01 May 2007 03:57:51 PM UTC, comment #5: |
Simon Eves <simoneves> |
Tue 01 May 2007 03:42:24 PM UTC, comment #4: I understand now. My apologies. |
Simon Eves <simoneves> |
Tue 01 May 2007 03:30:57 PM UTC, comment #3: There is no "missing feature".
|
Earl Hood <ehood> |
Tue 01 May 2007 09:08:32 AM UTC, comment #2: It may not be a bug, but it's definitely a "missing feature" given that those attachments are interpreted correctly by every other e-mail program I've tested them with.
|
Simon Eves <simoneves> |
Mon 30 Apr 2007 11:49:54 PM UTC, comment #1: [Not a Bug] |
Earl Hood <ehood> |
Wed 18 Apr 2007 11:53:42 AM UTC, original submission:
I'm running MHonArc 2.6.15. I would test this with 2.6.16, but I don't have the time to do the upgrade right now, and there's no mention of anything related to this on the bug list, fixed or otherwise.
|
Simon Eves <simoneves> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 2 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007-05-01 | ehood | Status | None | Invalid | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed |
Powered by Savane 3.13-d3ae.
Corresponding source code
The combination of "usename" and "subdir" works perfectly.
I'll live with the relative insecurity of "usename" compared with "usenameext" for the sanity of my users (a limited and known group).
Thanks again for your help, and sorry again for the unjustified accusation.