lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Bugs: bug #20199, TCP appears to be "Shrinking...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #20199: TCP appears to be "Shrinking the Window"
Submitter: | Tom Evans <tom_evans> | ||
Submitted: | Mon 18 Jun 2007 05:03:58 AM UTC | ||
Category: | TCP | Severity: | 4 - Important |
Item Group: | Faulty Behaviour | Status: | Fixed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | kieranm |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
lwIP version: | None |
Jump to the original submission
Tue 04 Mar 2008 01:13:04 PM UTC, comment #10: |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Thu 20 Dec 2007 02:52:13 PM UTC, comment #9: I've checked this patch in. If anyone is in a position to test it that would be most helpful |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Thu 20 Dec 2007 12:45:51 PM UTC, comment #8: I've looked through the patch supplied by Per-Henrik Lundblom and extracted the relevant bits of silly window avoidance and produced a new patch against the current CVS. |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Tue 18 Dec 2007 01:51:51 PM UTC, comment #7: (from lwip-users, by Per-Henrik Lundblom)
|
Frédéric Bernon <fbernon> |
Fri 07 Dec 2007 03:46:44 PM UTC, comment #6: If say about current SWS avoidance implementation.
|
Oleg Tyshev <olegreen> |
Mon 16 Jul 2007 08:30:51 AM UTC, comment #5: (comment #4 is a reply to a Tom's email outside the bugtracker. He wrote ):
|
Frédéric Bernon <fbernon> |
Mon 16 Jul 2007 08:22:22 AM UTC, comment #4: Thank you Tom for your constructive comments. I think sweating and shaking because your window might shrink is perhaps getting a little over excited, but then maybe I don't understand the problem!
|
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Mon 16 Jul 2007 07:04:52 AM UTC, comment #3: Hi Tom,
|
Frédéric Bernon <fbernon> |
Mon 16 Jul 2007 03:19:20 AM UTC, comment #2: The current (2007) code looks to be doing something that was "STRONGLY DISCOURAGED in 1981 and also disobeying a "SHOULD NOT" from 1989.
|
Tom Evans <tom_evans> |
Fri 13 Jul 2007 11:56:27 AM UTC, comment #1: So I think the solution to this is to replace the code quoted in comment #1 with just
|
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Mon 18 Jun 2007 05:03:58 AM UTC, original submission:
This report is from code inspection. It may be wrong. I have not been able to demonstrate this condition as I don't have a running test harness for TCP (yet). I raised this issue in:
|
Tom Evans <tom_evans> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 8 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008-03-04 | kieranm | Status | Ready For Test | Fixed | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2007-12-31 | kieranm | Status | None | Ready For Test | |
2007-12-20 | kieranm | Attached File | - | Added sws_patch, #14675 | |
2007-12-18 | fbernon | Attached File | - | Added lwip_working.diff, #14653 | |
2007-08-29 | kieranm | Severity | 3 - Normal | 4 - Important | |
Assigned to | None | kieranm | |||
2007-07-13 | kieranm | Planned Release | 1.3.0 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-4448.
Corresponding source code
Closing this as fixed due to lack of reports to the contrary.