bugMapOSMatic - Bugs: bug #27435, non closed admin boundaries


bug #27435: non closed admin boundaries

Submitted by:  Hans-Christian Bohlmann <cantece>
Submitted on:  Sun 13 Sep 2009 07:24:18 PM UTC  
Votes:  1  
Category:  daemon Severity:  3 - Normal
Priority:  5 - Normal Status:  Invalid
Privacy:  Public Assigned to:  Maxime Petazzoni <mpetazzoni>
Open/Closed:  Closed Release:  None

Add a New Comment (Rich Markup)

You are not logged in

Please log in, so followups can be emailed to you.


Mon 21 Jun 2010 03:35:14 PM UTC, comment #4: 

This looks like it was a data problem, which has been fixed in OSM in the meantime. A rendering done today (http://maposmatic.org/jobs/15116) shows the entire Fontainebleau area, including the forest, which seems to be what was expected.

I'm closing the bug, please re-open if the rendering doesn't match what you expect.

Maxime Petazzoni <mpetazzoni>
Project AdministratorIn charge of this item.
Mon 14 Sep 2009 11:43:45 AM UTC, comment #3: 

perhaps it could be interesting to use the landuse=residential surface to limit the rendered map in boundaries that are to large (with large non-residential areas). The street index could still list and name the street that are outside the map.

Hans-Christian Bohlmann <cantece>
Mon 14 Sep 2009 11:41:25 AM UTC, comment #2: 

Thank for your answer. I did not understodd everything, but I can see
that the admin bounderies are not correct (boundary='administrative'
and admin_level='8' and name='Fontainebleau'. is correct). The 'real"
surface is much bigger (48.4635-48.3413; 2.5937-2.845 approx). The
builded city itself is small, but the admin surface (with the woods)
is bigger.
The extracted rendered city map is to small and not centered.

Hans-Christian Bohlmann <cantece>
Mon 14 Sep 2009 07:08:23 AM UTC, comment #1: 

Looking at the output from ocitysmap, first we are not getting any information about the city's contour. This will prevent the grey outskirt transparent layer from being rendered on the map, which is not a big problem. But this should not prevent the admin boundaries from being correct.

So I'd say that either we don't query the db for the correct admin boundaries, or these boundaries are not recorded properly inside the DB. FYI, for Fontainebleau, the admin boundaries we are working with are: 48.4244,2.7130 48.3987,2.7492. Is that correct ? The query to get that info was: boundary='administrative' and admin_level='8' and name='Fontainebleau'.

David Decotigny <daviddecotigny>
Project Administrator
Sun 13 Sep 2009 07:24:18 PM UTC, original submission:  

I've checked the map from Fontainebleau. Only half of the town is rendered (5% of admin superficy). perhaps the limits ob boundarie are not closed. should this be checked before rendreing?

Hans-Christian Bohlmann <cantece>


(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach Files:

No files currently attached


Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found


Carbon-Copy List
  • -email is unavailable- added by mpetazzoni (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by cantece (Voted in favor of this item)
  • -email is unavailable- added by daviddecotigny (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by cantece (Submitted the item)

    Do you think this task is very important?
    If so, you can add your encouragement to it.
    This task has 1 encouragement so far.

    Only logged-in users can vote.




    Follow 4 latest changes.

    Date Changed by Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced by
    2010-06-21 mpetazzoni StatusNone => Invalid
        Assigned toNone => mpetazzoni
        Open/ClosedOpen => Closed
    2009-09-17 cantece Carbon-Copy- => Added cantece

    Back to the top

    Powered by Savane 3.7