bugMapOSMatic - Bugs: bug #28486, administrative relation for...

 
 

bug #28486: administrative relation for Armissan not accepted

Submitter:  Guillaume Audirac <gaudirac>
Submitted:  Tue 05 Jan 2010 05:02:14 AM UTC
   
 
Category:  daemon Severity:  3 - Normal
Priority:  * 5 - Normal Status:  Invalid
Privacy:  Public Assigned to:  mpetazzoni
Open/Closed:  Closed Release:  None
* Mandatory Fields

Add a New Comment Rich Markup
   

Tue 11 May 2010 02:47:11 PM UTC, comment #4: 

Thanks for the heads up. Closing as invalid.

Maxime Petazzoni <mpetazzoni>
Group administrator
Wed 28 Apr 2010 09:09:39 AM UTC, comment #3: 

I finally noticed that Nominatim is not getting properly updated due to database corruption: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim

This bug is directly related to this and can be rejected or closed.
Thanks.

Guillaume Audirac <gaudirac>
Tue 05 Jan 2010 10:35:08 AM UTC, comment #2: 

For an administrative area, a relation with several members is quite common at it follows the recommendations found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_France/Tracer_les_limites_administratives
If this is the cause, it should happen for many other areas.

Guillaume Audirac <gaudirac>
Tue 05 Jan 2010 09:04:05 AM UTC, comment #1: 

The administrative boundary is a correctly at admin_level=8 and boundary=administrative. However it is made of two ways. Is this the cause of the bug?

http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/302228

<osm version="0.6" generator="OpenStreetMap server">
−
<relation id="302228" visible="true" timestamp="2009-10-29T16:14:51Z" version="2" changeset="2982068" user="sly_bot" uid="185836">
<member type="way" ref="43127386" role=""/>
<member type="way" ref="43127384" role=""/>
<tag k="addr:postcode" v="11110"/>
<tag k="admin_level" v="8"/>
<tag k="boundary" v="administrative"/>
<tag k="name" v="Armissan"/>
<tag k="ref:INSEE" v="11014"/>
<tag k="type" v="boundary"/>
</relation>
</osm>

David Mentré <dmentre>
Group administrator
Tue 05 Jan 2010 05:02:14 AM UTC, original submission:  

Hi,

I tried generating the map for Armissan. The relation is there and seems to be correct using the relation analyzer. But still, MapOSMatic mentions "administrative boundary missing". What's wrong ?

OSM location:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.1874&lon=3.0932&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF

Relation analyzer from Osmose:
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/tools/relation_analyser/cgi-bin/relation_result.py?NumRelation=302228

Thanks.
Guillaume

Guillaume Audirac <gaudirac>

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach Files:
   
   
Comment:
   

No files currently attached

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

Carbon-Copy List
  • -email is unavailable- added by mpetazzoni (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by dmentre (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by gaudirac (Submitted the item)
  • -email is unavailable- added by gaudirac
  •  

    There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.

    Only logged-in users can vote.

     

    Follow 5 latest changes.

    Date Changed by Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced by
    2010-05-11 mpetazzoni CategoryNone daemon
        StatusNone Invalid
        Assigned toNone mpetazzoni
        Open/ClosedOpen Closed
    2010-01-05 gaudirac Carbon-Copy- Added -email is unavailable-

    Back to the top

    Powered by Savane 3.13-d3ae.
    Corresponding source code