GNU TeXmacs - Bugs: bug #7684, texmacs input to maxima is...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #7684: texmacs input to maxima is incorrectly converted
Submitter: | Ralf Treinen <treinen> | ||
Submitted: | Wed 11 Feb 2004 07:51:22 PM UTC | ||
Category: | Plugins | Priority: | 4 - Bit lower |
Item Group: | Wishlist | Status: | Fixed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | grozin |
Originator Name: | Karl Hegbloom | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Release: | None | Release: | 1.0.3 |
Fixed Release: | None | Fixed Release: | |
Keywords: | maxima plugin |
Jump to the original submission
Mon 27 Feb 2017 07:04:10 PM UTC, comment #9: |
Philippe Joyez <pjoyez> |
Mon 10 Sep 2012 11:38:57 AM UTC, comment #8: No. Now we assume that the user has to insert * before <mathd>. So, this will become integrate(f3*1,x). |
Andrey Grozin <grozin> |
Sun 09 Sep 2012 06:52:03 AM UTC, comment #7: What if the user wanted to integrate a function named "f3"? wouldn't that be expanded into "integrate(f31,x)" ? |
Miguel de Benito <mdbenito> |
Thu 23 Aug 2012 03:14:17 AM UTC, comment #6: I have a good idea. Let's rewrite "<mathd>" to "1,". Then "<big|int><something>*<mathd>x" will become "integrate(<something>*1,x)". Also, "<big|int><mathd>x" will become "integrate(1,x)" (currently, it produces "integrate(,x)" - a syntax error).
|
Andrey Grozin <grozin> |
Thu 09 Aug 2012 10:08:05 AM UTC, comment #5: It would be nice if x*d x could be made to work, if this is not too difficult (maybe simply rewrite *<mathd> into <mathd> or so). Mathematically speaking, this is the correct semantics (x*d x being the differential form to be integrated).
|
Joris van der Hoeven <vdhoeven> |
Mon 06 Aug 2012 06:34:19 PM UTC, comment #4: Understood.
|
Miguel de Benito <mdbenito> |
Sat 04 Aug 2012 03:23:56 PM UTC, comment #3: Users of the maxima plugin are supposed to read arXiv:cs/0504039. It is clearly stated there that there should be no * before <mathd>. |
Andrey Grozin <grozin> |
Fri 03 Aug 2012 06:41:49 PM UTC, comment #2: I think dx should be preceded by "apply", multiplying doesn't make any sense to me. But it could to other people, so indeed, how would the user know?
|
Miguel de Benito <mdbenito> |
Mon 26 Mar 2012 09:06:02 PM UTC, comment #1: In the present version of texmacs (1.0.7.15) the missing parenthesis problem reported here has been fixed, so we could close the bug.
|
Philippe Joyez <pjoyez> |
Wed 11 Feb 2004 07:51:22 PM UTC, original submission:
Debian user Karl Hegbloom reports the following error :
|
Ralf Treinen <treinen> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 9 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-02-27 | pjoyez | Status | Need Info | Fixed | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2012-08-03 | mdbenito | Priority | 5 - Normal | 4 - Bit lower | |
Status | None | Need Info | |||
Assigned to | None | grozin | |||
2006-06-15 | #48748 | Carbon-Copy | - | Added rvb | |
2005-02-26 | treinen | Originator Name | Karl Hegbloom | ||
2004-04-20 | ddaa | Category | User Interface | Plugins | |
2004-02-11 | treinen | Attached File | - | Added bug.tm, #1045 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-d3ae.
Corresponding source code
It seems comment #6 was implemented. The original problem is fixed. Closing.