mldonkey, a multi-networks file-sharing client - Bugs: bug #16926, mldonkey does not understand DNAME...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #16926: mldonkey does not understand DNAME dns records
Submitter: | Samuel Mimram <smimram> | ||
Submitted: | Fri 23 Jun 2006 03:26:54 PM UTC | ||
Category: | Core | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Item Group: | Feature request | Status: | Wont Fix |
Assigned to: | None | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Release: | None | Release: | |
Operating System: | None | Binaries Origin: | Debian package |
CPU type: | None |
Tue 27 Jun 2006 05:44:38 PM UTC, comment #2: |
spiralvoice <spiralvoice> |
Tue 27 Jun 2006 05:34:02 PM UTC, comment #1: How to create a test case? |
spiralvoice <spiralvoice> |
Fri 23 Jun 2006 03:26:54 PM UTC, original submission:
Hi,
|
Samuel Mimram <smimram> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 3 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006-06-27 | spiralvoice | Status | None | Wont Fix | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2006-06-23 | smimram | Carbon-Copy | - | Added -email is unavailable- |
Powered by Savane 3.13-3230.
Corresponding source code
After some use of Google it seems to me that DNAME is part of
the IPv6 specification not liked by many users. Some users say
DNAME is already dead, others say its a bad implementation.
Nonetheless, MLDonkey does not support IPv6, therefore this bug is a wont-fix.