bugZoneCheck - Bugs: bug #28694, IWBN to test EDNS0 support

 
 

bug #28694: IWBN to test EDNS0 support

Submitter:  Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer>
Submitted:  Wed 20 Jan 2010 08:49:13 AM UTC
   
 
Category:  * tests Severity:  High
Priority:  5 - Normal Item Group:  * Feature request
Status:  Fixed Privacy:  Public
Assigned to:  chabannf Open/Closed:  Closed
* Mandatory Fields

Add a New Comment Rich Markup
   

Wed 02 Jun 2010 09:40:41 AM UTC, comment #2: 

Fixed in CVS :
for the test see http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/zonecheck/test/dnssec.rb?root=zonecheck&view=log

Furthermore, all requests are send with EDNS if option --edns=always or if --edns=auto and tests performed at the beginning are correct (all the route to the nameserver allow EDNS). You can disallow the use of edns with --edns never.

Fabien CHABANNE <chabannf>
Group Member
Wed 20 Jan 2010 08:53:45 AM UTC, comment #1: 

Side note: IWBN to have a test "TCP or EDNS support" to be sure a name server supports at least one way to send large data. See also #28695

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer>
Group administrator
Wed 20 Jan 2010 08:49:13 AM UTC, original submission:  

Modern DNS requests require the support of responses larger than the old limit of 512 bytes. So, it would be nice to be able to test if the authoritative name servers of a domain properly handle EDNS requests.

At least they must be reply FORMERR and, better, they must return the EDNS0 section with their limit (and it has to be larger than 512 bytes).

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer>
Group administrator

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach Files:
   
   
Comment:
   

No files currently attached

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

Carbon-Copy List
  • -email is unavailable- added by chabannf (Updated the item)
  • -email is unavailable- added by bortzmeyer (Submitted the item)
  •  

    There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.

    Only logged-in users can vote.

     

    Follow 4 latest changes.

    Date Changed by Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced by
    2010-06-22 chabannf Open/ClosedOpen Closed
    2010-06-02 chabannf StatusIn Progress Fixed
    2010-04-27 chabannf StatusConfirmed In Progress
    2010-04-01 chabannf Assigned toNone chabannf

    Back to the top

    Powered by Savane 3.13-d3ae.
    Corresponding source code