GNU nano - Patches: patch #9117, Fix inconsistently named...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #9117: Fix inconsistently named xfce4-terminal in winio.c comments
Submitter: | David Lawrence Ramsey <dolorous> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 13 Sep 2016 03:41:03 PM UTC | ||
Priority: | 5 - Normal | Status: | Wont Do |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | None |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Release: | None |
Thu 20 Oct 2016 05:41:12 PM UTC, comment #3: |
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Thu 20 Oct 2016 03:52:00 PM UTC, comment #2: Okay. (If I recall correctly, both Gnome-Terminal and XFCE's Terminal are based on the vte library anyway, so they should accept the same sequences.) New patch attached which does that. |
David Lawrence Ramsey <dolorous> |
Wed 19 Oct 2016 03:53:28 PM UTC, comment #1: (Hrm... I had my email address mistyped and didn't get a notification... :( )
|
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Tue 13 Sep 2016 03:41:03 PM UTC, original submission:
The attached patch, against nano git 4de0a50, fixes a documentation problem in the comments of winio.c where the terminal included with xfce4 is referred to as Terminal in most places, but Xfce4-terminal in some places. Since the original references of Terminal are to the Terminal of Xfce4, this names it consistently. |
David Lawrence Ramsey <dolorous> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 4 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-01-07 | bens | Status | None | Wont Do | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2016-10-20 | dolorous | Attached File | - | Added nano-55878ef-fixedxfcecomments.patch, #38773 | |
2016-09-13 | dolorous | Attached File | - | Added nano-4de0a50-xfcecomments.patch, #38501 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-d3ae.
Corresponding source code
Yes, they are both based on the VTE library, so they probably accept the same Escape sequences, but I'm not sure they interpret all the single-integer keycodes in the same way.