lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Tasks: task #14494, Implement SO_BINDTODEVICE
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #14494: Implement SO_BINDTODEVICE
Submitter: | Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> | ||
Submitted: | Fri 28 Apr 2017 10:46:37 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Should Start On: | Fri 28 Apr 2017 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Should be Finished on: | Fri 28 Apr 2017 12:00:00 AM UTC | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | Done | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | dziegel | Percent Complete: | 100% |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
Effort: | 0.00 |
Thu 04 May 2017 07:09:29 AM UTC, comment #4: |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Thu 04 May 2017 05:40:31 AM UTC, comment #3: Hi Simon,
|
Sandip Dalvi <sandipd> |
Wed 03 May 2017 07:15:39 PM UTC, comment #2: Let's drop getsockopt(SO_BINDTODEVICE) in order to reduce code size until somebody needs it.
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Wed 03 May 2017 08:38:01 AM UTC, comment #1: Dirk nearly did this by now... |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Fri 28 Apr 2017 10:46:37 AM UTC, original submission:
Patches welcome :-) |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 6 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-05-04 | sandipd | Attached File | - | Added 0001-sockets-task-14494-Implement-SO_BINDTODEVICE.patch, #40577 | |
2017-05-03 | goldsimon | Status | None | Done | |
Percent Complete | 60% | 100% | |||
Assigned to | None | dziegel | |||
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2017-05-02 | dziegel | Percent Complete | 0% | 60% |
Powered by Savane 3.13-f8d8.
Corresponding source code
No, that doesn't fit our implementation, sorry. After all, only getsockopt is missing by now, your patch contains a full implementation.
Anyway, have you noticed that you don't need to compare the netif name but only the index?