taskMapOSMatic - Tasks: task #12237, List shops that can send/receive...

 
 

task #12237: List shops that can send/receive parcels or letters into the Public Building Index

Submitter:  David MentrĂ© <dmentre>
Submitted:  Thu 06 Sep 2012 01:22:02 PM UTC
   
 
Should Start On:  Wed 05 Sep 2012 10:00:00 PM UTC Should be Finished on:  Wed 05 Sep 2012 10:00:00 PM UTC
Category:  ocitysmap Priority:  * 5 - Normal
Status:  None Privacy:  Public
Assigned to:  None Percent Complete:  0%
Open/Closed:  Open Release:  2012.04
Effort:  0.00
* Mandatory Fields

Add a New Comment Rich Markup
   

Thu 06 Sep 2012 01:22:02 PM UTC, original submission:  


>2012/5/28 malenki <maposmatic@malenki.ch>:
>> I realised that a lot of amentiy=* show up in the index of the
>> created maps as Public Buildings and have only their name on it.
>> This gets confusing when there is e.g. a post office in a stationery
>> shop without a descriptive name.
>> The result is e.g. an index entry "Stationery and Toys John Doe".
>> My suggestion: prepend a (translatable) description of the amenity in
>> front of its name.
>> My example would be then: "Post Office: Stationery and Toys John Doe"
>
>I don't clearly see the use case. Would you have an example at hand?


fyi: at least in my region it is quite common for a lot of stationery
shops (and other kinds of shops too)) to be also a point to pick up or
sent parcels and/or letters.
(In the most small towns there isn't a dedicated post office anymore. If
there is such a thing remaining, it is most likely integrated into a
stationery shop because the ex parcel-and-letters monopolist wants to
save money.)

My first suggestion a little re-thought: It would be handier to add a
subheading "parcel and letter services" or similar before listing the
objects tagged with post_office.

The map I recently created and refer to:
http://dev.maposmatic.org/jobs/643

A screenshot from the part of the map index I refer to with
explanations:
http://malenki.ch/d/maposmatic_000643_2012-06-12_21-11_BrandErbisdorfenglish_publics.png

These are the OSM objects marked with the explanations:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1277525793
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1311955430
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/334228706
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1278544510

Additionally, at "Villages" there is non of the five villages belonging
to town rendered mentioned, but only one place=locality which shouldn't
show up there imo.

David Mentré <dmentre>
Group administrator

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach Files:
   
   
Comment:
   

No files currently attached

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

Carbon-Copy List
  • -email is unavailable- added by dmentre (Submitted the item)
  • -email is unavailable- added by dmentre
  •  

    There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.

    Only logged-in users can vote.

     

    Follows 1 latest change.

    Date Changed by Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced by
    2012-09-06 dmentre Carbon-Copy- Added -email is unavailable-

    Back to the top

    Powered by Savane 3.13-cf05.
    Corresponding source code