lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Tasks: task #7891, FTP Client for lwip ready for test
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #7891: FTP Client for lwip ready for test
Submitter: | Iordan Neshev <iordan_neshev> | ||
Submitted: | Wed 26 Mar 2008 02:37:12 PM UTC | ||
Votes: | 100 | ||
Category: | None | Should Start On: | Wed 26 Mar 2008 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Should be Finished on: | Wed 26 Mar 2008 12:00:00 AM UTC | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | None | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Percent Complete: | 0% |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
Effort: | 0.00 |
Jump to the original submission
Mon 02 Nov 2009 08:06:04 PM UTC, comment #10: |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Sun 30 Mar 2008 11:29:16 AM UTC, comment #9:
|
Frédéric Bernon <fbernon> |
Sat 29 Mar 2008 10:47:42 PM UTC, comment #8: I totally agree about your socket vs. raw API statements. But if you want to save RAM or processing time: you can always mix raw-API-apps and socket-apps in the same product, that's how we do it: port the existing socket apps and develop our own raw API apps.
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Sat 29 Mar 2008 08:23:08 PM UTC, comment #7:
I'm sure that a client, based on the raw api
|
Iordan Neshev <iordan_neshev> |
Fri 28 Mar 2008 06:23:23 PM UTC, comment #6: Having an FTP client for lwIP is cool, of course! But just out of curiosity: why did you write your own socket layer? Isn't the lwIP raw API more efficient?
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Fri 28 Mar 2008 05:42:48 PM UTC, comment #5: Thanks God, I found the original source files.
|
Iordan Neshev <iordan_neshev> |
Fri 28 Mar 2008 03:43:08 PM UTC, comment #4: Sadly promises aren't always kept, and have no legal standing! By putting it up here (even without the further advertisment of it) you're distributing the software and so have broken the licence agreement.
|
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Fri 28 Mar 2008 03:23:00 PM UTC, comment #3: In the .zip there is a .txt with a guide
|
Iordan Neshev <iordan_neshev> |
Fri 28 Mar 2008 03:13:45 PM UTC, comment #2: Oops, ignore that eCosCentric copyright - I was looking at the wrong tree. The public CVS version does not have that line. Everything else is the same. |
Jonathan Larmour <jifl> |
Fri 28 Mar 2008 03:12:16 PM UTC, comment #1: This may well be useful to someone. However, as you say in the leading comment, it is derived from the eCos ftp client (and looking at the code, indeed it clearly is). This means it is covered by the eCos GPL license.
|
Jonathan Larmour <jifl> |
Wed 26 Mar 2008 02:37:12 PM UTC, original submission:
Hello,
|
Iordan Neshev <iordan_neshev> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 100 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 6 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016-08-19 | dinesh01 | Carbon-Copy | - | Added dinesh01 | |
2009-11-03 | kieranm | Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |
2008-03-28 | iordan_neshev | Attached File | - | Added ftpclient v01a.rar, #15356 | |
2008-03-28 | kieranm | Attached File | #15340 | Removed | |
2008-03-26 | iordan_neshev | Attached File | - | Added fptclient_v01.zip, #15340 | |
Carbon-Copy | - | Added iordan_neshev |
Powered by Savane 3.13-f8d8.
Corresponding source code
A year and a half has passed since this task was started and unless anyone changed their mind about this, it seems as if we should close it. Having ready-to-use, free socket software is a good thin, but it can be hosted in another repository.