bugProgramming from the Ground Up Book - Bugs: bug #18506, Does mul have two syntaxes?

 
 

bug #18506: Does mul have two syntaxes?

Submitter:  None
Submitted:  Mon 11 Dec 2006 09:56:54 PM UTC
 
Category:  None Severity:  3 - Normal
Item Group:  None Status:  None
Privacy:  Public Assigned to:  None
Open/Closed:  Open
* Mandatory Fields

Add a New Comment (Rich Markup)
   

Comment Type & Canned Response:
       No canned response available

 

Thu 17 May 2007 10:21:24 AM UTC, comment #1: 

mul and imul are single Operand instructions.
They additionally take values in al, ax, eax and store in dx, dx:ax , edx:eax respectively, because of the possibility of an overflow.
The second version dx:ax already existed on 16-bit arch.

Anonymous
Mon 11 Dec 2006 09:56:54 PM UTC, original submission:  

When I assemble this using as:

mul %eax, %ecx

the following error occurs:
Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mul'

According to some folks on freenode #asm, this syntax for mul does not exist. Instead, mul takes one operand and stores the result into %edx:%eax.

Anonymous

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach Files:
   
   
Comment:
   

No files currently attached

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

CC list is empty

 

There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.

Only logged-in users can vote.

 

 

 

 

No changes have been made to this item

Back to the top

Powered by Savane 3.9