bugSELF Platform - Bugs: bug #22392, Unselectable items in the version...

 
 

bug #22392: Unselectable items in the version tree

Submitted by:  Federico Heinz <fheinz>
Submitted on:  Fri 22 Feb 2008 06:14:45 PM UTC  
 
Category: NoneSeverity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: NoneStatus: Need Info
Privacy: PublicAssigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open

Add a New Comment(Rich Markup)
   

You are not logged in

Please log in, so followups can be emailed to you.

 

(Jump to the original submission Jump to the original submission)

Sun 23 Nov 2008 03:30:51 AM UTC, comment #6:

http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/dating+a+taurus+man - dating a taurus man
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/jennifer+freeman+and+omarion+dating - jennifer freeman and omarion dating
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/dating+online+lakeland+fl - dating online lakeland fl
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/free+online+dating+sydney - free online dating sydney
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/mind+and+soul+dating+love+online+body - mind and soul dating love online body
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/amateur+dating+online - amateur dating online
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/layer+of+the+skin+dating+online+good+things - layer of the skin dating online good things
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/free+sex+dating+sites+with+instant+messaging - free sex dating sites with instant messaging
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/wild+public+sex+dating - wild public sex dating
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/hot+kinky+sex+slave+dating - hot kinky sex slave dating
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/fun+sex+spanking+dating - fun sex spanking dating
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/spanking+bondage+kinky+sex+dating - spanking bondage kinky sex dating
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/sex+slaves+kinky+coeds+dating - sex slaves kinky coeds dating
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/fun+kinky+bondage+slave+sex+dating - fun kinky bondage slave sex dating
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/arkansas+free+adult+personals - arkansas free adult personals
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/canada+adult+friend+finder - canada adult friend finder
We cannot guarantee that these keywords will improve your campaign performance. We reserve the right to disapprove any keywords you add.
http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=//dating365.co.cc/birmingham+adult+friend+finder - birmingham adult friend finder

Anonymous
Mon 24 Mar 2008 02:08:23 PM UTC, comment #5:

Just knowing that someone is working on something doesn't tell you what they are doing with it. They could be doing something completely opposite of what you want to do, or something entirely unrelated.

This is an incentive to publish what you do, and to do so early and often. If you want others to contribute to what you are doing, you should publish often, so other can see what you did and work on it. If you don't, others might duplicate your work and do it faster, and your contribution will end up in a dry branch.

Federico Heinz <fheinz>
Sat 22 Mar 2008 03:24:28 PM UTC, comment #4:

In a collaborative environment, particularly when there are thousands of users, it is very useful to know if there are others who are like me interested in the same topic, who are like me willing to work on the same learning object. Take the example of a google document, where several users collaboratively editing the same.

Also in community portals, it is important to know, if there are others who are currently logged in, etc. This allows the possibility of knowing, networking, meeting them in a jabber room etc.

I personally would like to give indications to others that some one is working.

However, what you are saying is good, if not knowing is an incentive of a sort. Does this help people to collaborate more vigorously than in case where they know that someone is working.

Nagarjuna G. <nagarjun>
Project Administrator
Sat 22 Mar 2008 02:03:10 PM UTC, comment #3:

It is no-one's bussiness whether I am working on an object or not, and I shouldn't care whether others are doing it! What I do in my private space of unpublished versions concerns only me.

If two people are working concurrently in the same branch, I expect a branch resolution protocol to ensue: two successor versions of the same object will appear in the history, and the user will be able to compare them and, if it makes sense, merge them.

Federico Heinz <fheinz>
Sat 22 Mar 2008 09:16:03 AM UTC, comment #2:

Any comments, Fede?

Nagarjuna G. <nagarjun>
Project Administrator
Fri 21 Mar 2008 05:14:55 AM UTC, comment #1:

This is the only indication other users have to know that some one is also working on the current object. Till we have another way of indicating, I suggest we keep it.

I will, however, close this only after we reach an agreement on this.

Nagarjuna G. <nagarjun>
Project Administrator
Fri 22 Feb 2008 06:14:45 PM UTC, original submission:

Currently, the version tree at <http://cselfish.selfplatform.eu:8081/selfplatform/versions_tree_content?ssid=968&cssid=955> displays a version 1.1 by Rajiv, which selfuser can see but not edir. I Suspect this may be a version that was saved, but not published. If this is the case, the version should be invisible to other users.

Federico Heinz <fheinz>

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach File(s):
   
   
Comment:
   

No files currently attached

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

Carbon-Copy List
  • -unavailable- added by nagarjun (Posted a comment)
  • -unavailable- added by fheinz (Submitted the item)
  •  

    Do you think this task is very important?
    If so, you can click here to add your encouragement to it.
    This task has 0 encouragements so far.

    Only logged-in users can vote.

     

    Please enter the title of George Orwell's famous dystopian book (it's a date):

     

     

    Follows 1 latest change.

    Date Changed By Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced By
    Sat 22 Mar 2008 09:16:03 AM UTCnagarjunStatusNone=>Need Info

    Back to the top


    Powered by Savane 3.1-cleanup1