LaTeX semantic checker - Bugs: bug #54751, Consider raising Warning 12 for...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #54751: Consider raising Warning 12 for cases like "something, i.e. \(x\)"
Submitter: | Ivan Kokan <ivankokan> | ||
Submitted: | Fri 28 Sep 2018 10:23:48 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Item Group: | None | Status: | Fixed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | gvol |
Open/Closed: | Closed |
Fri 30 Sep 2022 04:19:39 AM UTC, comment #4: |
Ivan Andrus <gvol> |
Tue 02 Oct 2018 02:44:17 AM UTC, comment #3: I realized that I have some local changes that I was working on to fix https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?53347
|
Ivan Andrus <gvol> |
Mon 01 Oct 2018 08:39:18 AM UTC, comment #2: Here is the example for attached test_12.tex:
|
Ivan Kokan <ivankokan> |
Mon 01 Oct 2018 04:17:38 AM UTC, comment #1: That actually does raise a warning for me. What doesn't is "something, i.e. (x)".
|
Ivan Andrus <gvol> |
Fri 28 Sep 2018 10:23:48 AM UTC, original submission:
Warning 12 is being raised on this: "something, i.e. something", but not for this one: "something, i.e. \(x\)".
|
Ivan Kokan <ivankokan> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 5 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022-09-30 | gvol | Status | Confirmed | Fixed | |
Assigned to | None | gvol | |||
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2018-11-27 | gvol | Status | None | Confirmed | |
2018-10-01 | ivankokan | Attached File | - | Added test_12.tex, #45122 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-4448.
Corresponding source code
I have what I believe is a reasonable fix for this (and for https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?53347). I have updated the regex to "([^A-Z@.])\.[.!?:]*\s[ \`([]*[a-z]" which I think accounts for most cases that we care about. Let me know if you think there are any other character we should skip past.
I'm hoping to make a release soon, after which it will have to propagate out to the distributions.