lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Patches: patch #9734, fix TCP_CLOSE in high load...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #9734: fix TCP_CLOSE in high load applications
Submitter: | Dainius Zilys <vakaras> | ||
Submitted: | Fri 14 Dec 2018 09:08:41 AM UTC | ||
Category: | TCP | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | Invalid | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | goldsimon | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Planned Release: | None |
Tue 18 Dec 2018 06:22:32 AM UTC, comment #2: |
Dainius Zilys <vakaras> |
Mon 17 Dec 2018 08:20:36 PM UTC, comment #1: There must be something wrong in your description:
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Fri 14 Dec 2018 09:08:41 AM UTC, original submission:
api_msg.c file:
|
Dainius Zilys <vakaras> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 5 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-12-18 | dziegel | Status | Works For Me | Invalid | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2018-12-17 | goldsimon | Status | None | Works For Me | |
Assigned to | None | goldsimon | |||
2018-12-14 | vakaras | Attached File | - | Added tcp_close_api_msg.patch, #45648 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-d3ae.
Corresponding source code
Yes, you could be right. I did not sent new arrived packets to tcpip_thread() via tcpip_input(), but directly to the ethernet_input() from another thread. So multitasking issue happened.
The patch can be ignored.