AVR Downloader/UploaDEr - Bugs: bug #18339, safemode doesn't care for...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #18339: safemode doesn't care for pgm->read_byte() return values
Submitter: | Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 21 Nov 2006 06:17:00 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Priority: | 5 - Normal | Item Group: | None |
Status: | None | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | c_oflynn | Originator Name: | Joerg Wunsch |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Release: | None |
Programmer hardware: | Device type: |
Mon 11 Dec 2006 02:45:04 PM UTC, comment #3: |
Colin O Flynn <c_oflynn> |
Mon 11 Dec 2006 02:24:33 PM UTC, comment #2: Seems a bit like a hack to me :), but OK, the implementation
|
Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch> |
Tue 21 Nov 2006 08:33:00 PM UTC, comment #1: Ooops - quite the oversight!
|
Colin O Flynn <c_oflynn> |
Tue 21 Nov 2006 06:17:00 PM UTC, original submission:
The safemode code doesn't care for the values returned by
|
Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 5 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006-12-11 | c_oflynn | Attached File | - | Added safemode_patch.diff, #11505 | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2006-12-11 | c_oflynn | Attached File | #11310 | Removed | |
2006-11-21 | c_oflynn | Attached File | - | Added safemode_patch.diff, #11310 | |
2006-11-21 | joerg_wunsch | Carbon-Copy | - | Added -email is unavailable- |
Powered by Savane 3.13-758e.
Corresponding source code
Changes are in CVS.
It's sort a hack ;-) Based on how I did the original code, I thought it was the safest and cleanest way to add that feature. This way the error is the same as if you didn't have a reliable programmer, which to me makes sense as that function failing.
-Colin
(file #11505)