AVR Downloader/UploaDEr - Bugs: bug #34281, Wrong Chip ID#
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #34281: Wrong Chip ID#
Submitter: | Brian Stott <bstott> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 13 Sep 2011 10:53:40 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Priority: | 5 - Normal | Item Group: | None |
Status: | Invalid | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Originator Name: | Brian Stott |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Release: | None |
Programmer hardware: | Device type: |
Tue 13 Sep 2011 01:20:52 PM UTC, comment #5: |
Brian Stott <bstott> |
Tue 13 Sep 2011 01:17:19 PM UTC, comment #4: - Solved -
|
Brian Stott <bstott> |
Tue 13 Sep 2011 12:02:11 PM UTC, comment #3: In that case, it would be sufficient to override the ID
|
Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch> |
Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:59:22 AM UTC, comment #2: From the datasheet, 0x1e9514 is the correct device signature of the atmega328, not the atmega328p.
|
jonathan nifenecker <crazyiop> |
Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:47:57 AM UTC, comment #1: What programming device are you using, what exact commandline?
|
Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch> |
Tue 13 Sep 2011 10:53:40 AM UTC, original submission:
When used with Atmel Manfacturer's Chip - this case Atmega328P the avrdude application is hard coded to compare reported chip ID with inaccurate ID(s).
|
Brian Stott <bstott> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 4 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011-09-13 | joerg_wunsch | Status | Need Info | Invalid | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2011-09-13 | joerg_wunsch | Status | None | Need Info | |
2011-09-13 | bstott | Carbon-Copy | - | Added -email is unavailable- |
Powered by Savane 3.13-02a9.
Corresponding source code
Sorry Jason ---- I read your e-mail too late. It would have saved me more time. I recognize your solution.....
Thank you very much everyone....