Maneage - Tasks: task #15641, Webpage: Privacy Grade - Terms of...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #15641: Webpage: Privacy Grade - Terms of Service
Submitter: | Pedram Ashofteh-Ardakani <pedram> | ||
Submitted: | Thu 14 May 2020 07:17:12 PM UTC | ||
Should Start On: | Thu 14 May 2020 12:00:00 AM UTC | Should be Finished on: | Thu 14 May 2020 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Category: | Webpage | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | None | Privacy: | Public |
Percent Complete: | 0% | Assigned to: | None |
Open/Closed: | Open | Effort: | 0.00 |
Sat 16 May 2020 06:00:58 PM UTC, comment #3: |
Mohammad Akhlaghi <makhlaghi>![]() |
Fri 15 May 2020 07:10:21 PM UTC, comment #2: Good news is that the report shows no trackers found :-)
|
Pedram Ashofteh-Ardakani <pedram>![]() |
Thu 14 May 2020 11:20:55 PM UTC, comment #1: This is indeed an important point and we want maneage.org to receive the best privacy ranking.
|
Mohammad Akhlaghi <makhlaghi>![]() |
Thu 14 May 2020 07:17:12 PM UTC, original submission:
Checking the website on HTTP results in a pretty bad privacy grade `C+' by `DuckDuckGo'. This grade is a result of the following:
Having that said, visiting the website on HTTPS fixes the encryption issue and improves the grade up to a good `B+'.
|
Pedram Ashofteh-Ardakani <pedram>![]() |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Indeed, we should have a look to see what good webpages do. For example what does the DuckDuckGo scanning say for gnu.org? We should find some good pages that have a good ranking there and model it based on them.
Infact, a link to the privacy statement can also be put in the footer (task #15648).