Transport Sample Protocol - Tasks: task #8392, Implement message passing in...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #8392: Implement message passing in kernel Blackboard
Submitter: | Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy> | ||
Submitted: | Wed 09 Jul 2008 03:50:18 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Should Start On: | Wed 09 Jul 2008 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Should be Finished on: | Wed 09 Jul 2008 12:00:00 AM UTC | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | Done | Privacy: | Public |
Percent Complete: | 100% | Assigned to: | jaggy |
Open/Closed: | Open | Effort: | 0.00 |
( Jump to the original submission )
Fri 11 Jul 2008 06:33:03 PM UTC, comment #14: |
Eric NOULARD <erk>![]() |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 04:28:47 PM UTC, comment #13:
|
Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt>![]() |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 04:26:30 PM UTC, comment #12: the file
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy>![]() ![]() |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 09:51:12 AM UTC, comment #11: I think we should discuss this face-to-face
|
Eric NOULARD <erk>![]() |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 09:28:52 AM UTC, comment #10: To implement the callback mechanism, I need to add data in the S_BB structure.
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy>![]() ![]() |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 08:49:42 AM UTC, comment #9: Yep, it is basically the same thing, its just more convenient to have the message recieve as a callback on the kernel side. |
Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt>![]() |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 08:45:55 AM UTC, comment #8: OK I think I understand the need.
|
Eric NOULARD <erk>![]() |
Thu 10 Jul 2008 12:34:15 PM UTC, comment #7: comment #5 response:
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy>![]() ![]() |
Thu 10 Jul 2008 12:07:40 PM UTC, comment #6: If your need is a kind of user/kernel RPC then
|
Eric NOULARD <erk>![]() |
Thu 10 Jul 2008 11:54:18 AM UTC, comment #5:
|
Eric NOULARD <erk>![]() |
Thu 10 Jul 2008 08:08:43 AM UTC, comment #4:
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy>![]() ![]() |
Wed 09 Jul 2008 05:02:02 PM UTC, comment #3:
|
Eric NOULARD <erk>![]() |
Wed 09 Jul 2008 04:28:45 PM UTC, comment #2: What do you mean by "message passing"?
|
Eric NOULARD <erk>![]() |
Wed 09 Jul 2008 04:26:13 PM UTC, comment #1: I would like too discuss a way to improve msg passing API:
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy>![]() ![]() |
Wed 09 Jul 2008 03:50:18 PM UTC, original submission:
At this time no message passing is implemented in the kernel BB.
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy>![]() ![]() |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
I'm OK with this too.
B_BLACKBOARD_SEPARATE_SHARED for "apparently more" intrusive implementation
LOCAL_DATA concept in main.
GO ahead.