lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Tasks: task #14283, Add more detailed status callback
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #14283: Add more detailed status callback
Submitter: | Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> | ||
Submitted: | Thu 22 Dec 2016 09:01:45 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Should Start On: | Thu 22 Dec 2016 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Should be Finished on: | Thu 22 Dec 2016 12:00:00 AM UTC | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | Done | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | dziegel | Percent Complete: | 100% |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
Effort: | 0.00 |
Jump to the original submission
Mon 20 Feb 2017 06:27:41 PM UTC, comment #7: |
Dirk Ziegelmeier <dziegel> |
Thu 16 Feb 2017 07:16:17 AM UTC, comment #6: The union is a good idea. However, it makes calling the callback function a but ugly since one needs to create an instance of the union on the stack, fill it and pass a pointer to the callback. But all-in-all, I guess it's an improvement.
|
Dirk Ziegelmeier <dziegel> |
Tue 14 Feb 2017 10:45:14 PM UTC, comment #5: Dirk,
|
Joel Cunningham <jcunningham> |
Tue 14 Feb 2017 08:15:19 PM UTC, comment #4: Restructured, function call has less arguments now. new_ip can be obtained from netif, so no need to supply it in call args.
|
Dirk Ziegelmeier <dziegel> |
Mon 13 Feb 2017 07:39:08 AM UTC, comment #3: Looks good.
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Sun 12 Feb 2017 08:01:42 PM UTC, comment #2: - Is the function signature OK? Should we omit the void* arg? It makes the API more extensible.
|
Dirk Ziegelmeier <dziegel> |
Sun 12 Feb 2017 07:48:21 PM UTC, comment #1: API Proposal for discussion:
|
Dirk Ziegelmeier <dziegel> |
Thu 22 Dec 2016 09:01:45 AM UTC, original submission:
- integrate link, up/down and IP added/removed status into one callback
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 6 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-02-20 | dziegel | Status | Ready For Test | Done | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2017-02-16 | dziegel | Percent Complete | 0% | 100% | |
2017-02-14 | dziegel | Status | In Progress | Ready For Test | |
2017-02-13 | dziegel | Status | None | In Progress | |
Assigned to | None | dziegel |
Powered by Savane 3.13-02a9.
Corresponding source code
No further comments -> done