bugGlobulation 2 - Bugs: bug #16470, automatic clear/forbidden on...


bug #16470: automatic clear/forbidden on upgrade

Submitter:  Leo Wandersleb <giszmo>
Submitted:  Sun 30 Apr 2006 03:23:25 PM UTC
Severity:  1 - Wish Status:  None
Assigned to:  None Open/Closed:  Open
Release:  None Operating System:  None
* Mandatory Fields

Add a New Comment Rich Markup

Sun 24 May 2009 01:02:39 PM UTC, comment #5: 

as not all agree it makes sense to automatically "waste" resources in order to upgrade, i downgrade this bug to a wish. in my eyes it is still against the paradigm of no micromanagement and thus a bug.

Leo Wandersleb <giszmo>
Group Member
Thu 13 Mar 2008 11:26:55 AM UTC, comment #4: 

oops. i was not yet finished with my post ...

it now should be possible to upon build/upgrade
# draw the ghost building if there are no permanent obstacles like stone/water/sand
# draw clearing until all cleared and guard area until hostile buildings cleared
# draw forbidden until freed
# start building

so if placed in the middle of some forest, the ghost building with clearing area waits until the area is cleared maybe forever, but you can plan your town into the woods, too.

we have to check how efficient a 1 wide clearing layer can prepare the upgrade of a pool in fertile lands. maybe it keeps switching between forbidden and clearing.

Leo Wandersleb <giszmo>
Group Member
Thu 13 Mar 2008 11:15:36 AM UTC, comment #3: 

now with the modified clearing area and ghost buildings we are very close to this.

i would love to see it in beta4

Leo Wandersleb <giszmo>
Group Member
Mon 01 May 2006 07:45:49 PM UTC, comment #2: 

Why do you make the forbidden area?

I think clearing the area a new/upgraded building needs automaticly
before placing the construction site is good idea and should be doable.

Your second point sounds nice, but I think it would be complicated
to do it right.  I don't want to see 12 globs of mine bringing resources
to a pool upgrade construction side and then having an enemy player
micromanaging one of his globs there.
(Building a wall or just imprison it between forbidden areas.)
Resources also would be a problem, for almost the same reason.
You would always have to have a free glob around to cut it back.
(I'm glad if I have enough globs to carry the resources.)

Also it is quite natural that no nonconstruction workers cross
construction sites - and I have never seen wheat growing there in
real life.  So you can't call this part a bug.
But I would like the things you said for the game - I just don't
see how your second point could be implemented without causing
more harm than it would do good.

I would have prefered to discuss this on the glob2-ideas mailing list.  Before putting a good result into this wish list.

Kai Antweiler <snth>
Group administrator
Mon 01 May 2006 05:18:43 PM UTC, comment #1: 

I agree, that does make sense and fits with macromanagement gameplay style.

Kevin Clement <donkyhotay>
Group Member
Sun 30 Apr 2006 03:23:25 PM UTC, original submission:  

As it is very annoying and micromanagingish to have to first clear ressources around a building and then make the 1 wide area around this building forbidden (but leave 1 free so units from that building can leave it) to upgrade it i consider this to not be just a wish but a minor bug. These tasks should get initialized just by clicking upgrade.

Same with new buildings! New buildings are nothing but a plan to build something. They should neither block own units nor foreign units nore nature. but as soon as globs are free for the task they should care to clear the area and make it blocking not before the've put the first ressource in.

this bug goes loosely together with #15229

Leo Wandersleb <giszmo>
Group Member


(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach Files:

No files currently attached


   bug dependencies.

Items that depend on this one: None found


Carbon-Copy List
  • -email is unavailable- added by giszmo (Posted a comment)

    There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.

    Only logged-in users can vote.


    Follow 2 latest changes.

    Date Changed by Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced by
    2009-05-24 giszmo Severity2 - Minor 1 - Wish
    2008-03-13 giszmo Dependencies- Depends on bugs #15229

    Back to the top

    Powered by Savane 3.13-4448.
    Corresponding source code