lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Patches: patch #6521, lwip doesn't compile in 64_bit...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #6521: lwip doesn't compile in 64_bit computers
Submitter: | Rishi Khan <rishi> | ||
Submitted: | Fri 23 May 2008 07:03:50 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | Done | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | kieranm | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Planned Release: | 1.3.1 |
Jump to the original submission
Thu 25 Jun 2009 12:57:59 PM UTC, comment #12: |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Fri 01 May 2009 12:29:38 PM UTC, comment #11: I should be able to test that the unix port compiles on an x86_64 |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Tue 21 Apr 2009 06:46:24 PM UTC, comment #10: I really need some input on this to know whether it is done or not... |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Tue 14 Apr 2009 05:44:22 PM UTC, comment #9: As I don't have a 64-bit target, unfortunately, I can only compile the stack using the win32 and unix port and check for 64-bit compatibility warnings. I could try to get gcc & make running on my mac, though, never tried that...
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Fri 03 Apr 2009 11:14:58 AM UTC, comment #8: Can anyone comment on the status of this? |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Wed 18 Feb 2009 09:16:32 PM UTC, comment #7: If we're concerned about portability with the use of %d for u8_t we could always explicitly cast the argument to an 'int'.
|
Jonathan Larmour <jifl> |
Wed 18 Feb 2009 09:15:08 PM UTC, comment #6: I've worked my way through some of the files (only 3 yet:). I hope I didn't make it worse, but I think it's quite straightforward.
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Wed 18 Feb 2009 08:31:41 PM UTC, comment #5: Oops, it appears Jared posted a comment on the lwip-devel mailing list rather than here, in comments to this patch.
|
Mike Kleshov <kleshov> |
Wed 18 Feb 2009 07:48:49 PM UTC, comment #4: Looking through this, what's the suggested format string for
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Thu 12 Jun 2008 07:12:35 PM UTC, comment #3: I'll see what I can do. |
Rishi Khan <rishi> |
Fri 30 May 2008 12:27:32 PM UTC, comment #2: I agree this isn't really usable in the current state, but would welcome something that fixed it to address Jonathan's comments. |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Mon 26 May 2008 01:06:20 AM UTC, comment #1: Thanks for the patch.
|
Jonathan Larmour <jifl> |
Fri 23 May 2008 07:03:50 PM UTC, original submission:
I edited many files (mostly sockets.c) to fix the long/int problem. These really should be u32_t and s32_t. There were many places in sockets.c that used "%d" instead of "%"S_32F. I fixed all of these. I also edited all int calls to s32_t or u32_t (for unsigned int).
|
Rishi Khan <rishi> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 8 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009-06-25 | kieranm | Status | Need Info | Done | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2009-05-01 | kieranm | Assigned to | goldsimon | kieranm | |
2009-04-21 | goldsimon | Status | In Progress | Need Info | |
2009-04-03 | kieranm | Planned Release | None | 1.3.1 | |
2009-02-18 | goldsimon | Assigned to | None | goldsimon | |
2009-02-18 | goldsimon | Status | None | In Progress | |
2008-05-23 | rishi | Attached File | - | Added 64_bit.patch, #15718 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-02a9.
Corresponding source code
I've checked this on x86_64 using the unix port and it seems to compile. There were a couple of warnings from the unix port itself, but I've fixed those, and the core lwIP code showed no problems.