AVR Downloader/UploaDEr - Patches: patch #7594, Support for Atmel serial...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #7594: Support for Atmel serial UART-Bootloader "FastBoot"
Submitter: | Stefan <stefan_sn> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 09 Aug 2011 08:00:54 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | None | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Open/Closed: | Open |
Fri 13 Sep 2013 04:12:15 PM UTC, comment #4: |
Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch>![]() |
Tue 30 Aug 2011 06:11:39 PM UTC, comment #3: Joerg
|
Stefan <stefan_sn> |
Wed 24 Aug 2011 05:59:15 PM UTC, comment #2: Ok, so I will update the patch with documentation changes in the next days. I also think about to change the name of the programmer from 'pedabl' to 'fastboot'. So please wait with the integration of the patch. |
Stefan <stefan_sn> |
Wed 17 Aug 2011 02:39:25 PM UTC, comment #1: Please don't forget to submit documentation patches.
|
Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch>![]() |
Tue 09 Aug 2011 08:00:54 PM UTC, original submission:
At http://www.mikrocontroller.net/topic/73196 and http://www.mikrocontroller.net/articles/AVR_Bootloader_FastBoot_von_Peter_Dannegger exists an implementation of a serial bootloader for a wide range of 8-bit Atmel devices.
|
Stefan <stefan_sn> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
The patch contains unrelated changes to ser_posix.c/ser_win32.c
(different indentation level). I won't commit these changes.
If anything needs to be changed in those files, please resubmit
that.
Also, what happens if someone e.g. starts terminal mode on
a fastboot device, and tries to use one of the byte-access
functions, or tries a -U flash:r:foo.hex:i (paged read of
entire flash)?
Finally, the page write algorithm has changed meanwhile, the
respective backend functions are now called once per page
rather than on the entire memory region. Since I don't have
any fastboot-ready target around, I would appreciate if you
could adapt your patch to the new structure. (I can do it
myself, but it will be a "blind flight".)