lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Patches: patch #9751, UDP client/serveur support in...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #9751: UDP client/serveur support in lwiperf
Submitter: | David GIRAULT <dgirault> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 29 Jan 2019 03:53:15 PM UTC | ||
Category: | apps | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | In Progress | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | goldsimon | Open/Closed: | Open |
Planned Release: | None |
( Jump to the original submission )
Wed 17 Jul 2019 07:33:30 PM UTC, comment #11: |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon>![]() ![]() |
Thu 21 Mar 2019 12:30:17 PM UTC, comment #10: Hello,
|
Reda Maher <redamaher> |
Tue 05 Feb 2019 08:09:36 AM UTC, comment #9:
|
David GIRAULT <dgirault> |
Fri 01 Feb 2019 04:03:56 PM UTC, comment #8:
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon>![]() ![]() |
Fri 01 Feb 2019 03:10:47 PM UTC, comment #7:
|
David GIRAULT <dgirault> |
Wed 30 Jan 2019 06:35:06 PM UTC, comment #6:
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon>![]() ![]() |
Wed 30 Jan 2019 06:33:07 PM UTC, comment #5: Ok, so now I took the time to review your implementation and I see why you need the µs timing. However, seeing how you did that I can say this implementation is not portable. It only works in main loop mode (NO_SYS=1).
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon>![]() ![]() |
Wed 30 Jan 2019 05:44:24 PM UTC, comment #4: According to the delay_target calculation, since buf_len is constant 1470 (or 1450 with IPv6), the calculated delay is:
|
David GIRAULT <dgirault> |
Wed 30 Jan 2019 04:55:28 PM UTC, comment #3: Coding style things are easily fixed before pushing, I don't reject patches because of that.
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon>![]() ![]() |
Wed 30 Jan 2019 03:20:46 PM UTC, comment #2: Oh my bad, I don't try it on another platform.
|
David GIRAULT <dgirault> |
Wed 30 Jan 2019 02:57:35 PM UTC, comment #1: Nice work, but it doesn't compile because of:
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon>![]() ![]() |
Tue 29 Jan 2019 03:53:15 PM UTC, original submission:
Since we require this for WiFi certification of our product, I've added UDP modes in lwiperf.c
|
David GIRAULT <dgirault> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 5 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019-04-04 | spoboril | Carbon-Copy | - | ![]() |
Added spoboril |
2019-01-30 | goldsimon | Status | None | ![]() |
In Progress |
Assigned to | None | ![]() |
goldsimon | ||
2019-01-29 | dgirault | Attached File | - | ![]() |
Added 0001-lwiperf-added-support-for-UDP-client-server-mode.patch, #46123 |
Attached File | - | ![]() |
Added 0002-lwiperf-small-fixes-on-TCP-client-server-mode.patch, #46124 |
comment #10:
Yes. I just haven't found the time for the extra work, yet :-(