lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Bugs: bug #13315, PPP PAP authentication can result...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #13315: PPP PAP authentication can result in erroneous callbacks
| Submitter: | None | ||
| Submitted: | Mon 06 Jun 2005 05:37:11 PM UTC | ||
| Category: | None | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
| Item Group: | Faulty Behaviour | Status: | Fixed |
| Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | goldsimon |
| Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
| lwIP version: | CVS Head | ||
Jump to the original submission
|
Mon 11 Jan 2010 04:40:01 PM UTC, comment #7: |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
|
Mon 11 Jan 2010 09:43:42 AM UTC, comment #6: TODO: add bugtracker entry for the original pppd, as that seems to have this bug, too. -> wait for response from pppd developers. |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
|
Fri 04 Dec 2009 03:38:06 PM UTC, comment #5: Seems like this bug exists, see also patch #6969 (same for _authack). |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
|
Sat 02 May 2009 03:53:44 PM UTC, comment #4: I'm not really sure, but in bug #21680, Tom Evans wrote that in pppd v2.4.4, auth_withpeer_fail() (which is called at the end of the function where us_clientstate is set to UPAPCS_BADAUTH), calls lcp_close(), I wonder if that's got something to do with it or if that timeout is something not handled by the pppd code but an lwIP speciality?
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
|
Wed 29 Aug 2007 09:20:24 AM UTC, comment #3: As Marc has been looking at PPP recently I wonder if you could give some input on this? Would be nice to get a resolution to it, even if that involves marking it invalid. |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
|
Mon 26 Feb 2007 01:10:45 PM UTC, comment #2: Can anyone with some knowledge of PPP/PAP give some input on this. I'm no expert so can't resolve this one. |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
|
Wed 13 Sep 2006 10:40:35 PM UTC, comment #1: I am not sure this bug because all PPP reconnections of my device are stable (with PAP auth).
|
Anonymous |
|
Mon 06 Jun 2005 05:37:11 PM UTC, original submission:
In the PAP implementation there is a problem which means that timeouts can occur after the PAP layer has been shut down. |
Anonymous |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.

Forget that, it's fixed in the current pppd. Fixed by copying the code from pppd.