lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Bugs: bug #21699, segment leak in ooseq processing...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #21699: segment leak in ooseq processing when last data packet was lost
Submitter: | Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> | ||
Submitted: | Sun 02 Dec 2007 04:42:12 PM UTC | ||
Category: | TCP | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Item Group: | Crash Error | Status: | Fixed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | goldsimon |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
lwIP version: | None |
Jump to the original submission
Fri 14 Dec 2007 03:55:58 PM UTC, comment #7: |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Fri 14 Dec 2007 03:52:17 PM UTC, comment #6: Hello, Simon,
|
Oleg Tyshev <olegreen> |
Thu 13 Dec 2007 08:24:37 PM UTC, comment #5: Fixed: just checked in the last patch (from comment #2). |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Wed 05 Dec 2007 01:42:40 PM UTC, comment #4: Sounds sensible to me. Thanks for taking the time to investigate. |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Tue 04 Dec 2007 08:38:34 PM UTC, comment #3: As a start, I'll add an assert in tcp_pcb_remove() that checks whether any segments are left on unsent, unacked or ooseq.
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Mon 03 Dec 2007 09:19:10 PM UTC, comment #2: The 'proper' way to fix it (maybe a little bit too specialized for the scenario below) would be to change the code
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Mon 03 Dec 2007 09:06:20 PM UTC, comment #1: It seems that not only the ooseq processing has a problem (in fact, that is not really a problem).
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Sun 02 Dec 2007 04:42:12 PM UTC, original submission:
See this mail from Thomas Catalino for a detailed description: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/2007-12/msg00003.html
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 3 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007-12-13 | goldsimon | Status | Confirmed | Fixed | |
Assigned to | None | goldsimon | |||
Open/Closed | Open | Closed |
Powered by Savane 3.13-caa5.
Corresponding source code
Yep, it's debug code to get a breakpoint... sorry for that. I'll fix it.