lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Bugs: bug #22070, MIB_OBJECT_WRITE_ONLY not...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #22070: MIB_OBJECT_WRITE_ONLY not implemented in SNMP
Submitter: | Josh Strinch <mischief> | ||
Submitted: | Mon 21 Jan 2008 05:08:12 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Severity: | 2 - Minor |
Item Group: | Faulty Behaviour | Status: | Fixed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | goldsimon |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
lwIP version: | CVS Head |
Jump to the original submission
Fri 13 Feb 2015 08:13:03 PM UTC, comment #7: |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Thu 12 Feb 2015 10:22:27 PM UTC, comment #6: Back to the original summary: WRITEONLY is not implemented and the current implementation of getnext stops with NOSUCHNAME when iteration reaches a WRITEONLY value... |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Tue 04 May 2010 06:31:08 PM UTC, comment #5: Updated summary and status/severity to reflect the changes |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Wed 21 Apr 2010 08:12:25 PM UTC, comment #4: Removing the planned release 1.4.0 as I don't really need it and currently don't have the time. |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Mon 25 Jan 2010 05:44:21 PM UTC, comment #3: Partly fixed: write-only or not-accessible are still returned by getnext (though not by get any more). |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Sun 03 May 2009 03:45:19 PM UTC, comment #2: Oh, and do we need to prevent reading from WRITE_ONLY nodes, too? |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Sat 02 May 2009 04:23:27 PM UTC, comment #1: This response is also a little late and I think it's a pity noone from axxon replied so far.
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Mon 21 Jan 2008 05:08:12 PM UTC, original submission:
MIB_OBJECT_WRITE_ONLY isn't implemented - just READ_ONLY and READ_WRITE.
|
Josh Strinch <mischief> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 11 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015-02-13 | goldsimon | Status | Confirmed | Fixed | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2015-02-12 | goldsimon | Summary | SNMP: MIB_OBJECT_WRITE_ONLY is readable for getnext | MIB_OBJECT_WRITE_ONLY not implemented in SNMP | |
2013-01-14 | goldsimon | Category | Contrib | None | |
2010-05-04 | goldsimon | Severity | 3 - Normal | 2 - Minor | |
Status | In Progress | Confirmed | |||
Summary | MIB_OBJECT_WRITE_ONLY not implemented in SNMP | SNMP: MIB_OBJECT_WRITE_ONLY is readable for getnext | |||
2010-04-21 | goldsimon | Planned Release | 1.4.0 | ||
2009-08-20 | kieranm | Planned Release | 1.4.0 | ||
2009-05-02 | goldsimon | Status | None | In Progress | |
Assigned to | None | goldsimon |
Powered by Savane 3.13-758e.
Corresponding source code
Finally fixed, turns out I just misunderstood the RFC back in 2010...