lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Bugs: bug #3034, Implement real buffer pointer...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #3034: Implement real buffer pointer field to pbuf.
Submitter: | Leon Woestenberg <likewise> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 01 Apr 2003 12:31:48 PM UTC | ||
Category: | pbufs | Severity: | 3,5 |
Item Group: | Feature Request | Status: | Fixed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | None |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
lwIP version: | None |
Mon 26 Mar 2007 12:38:39 PM UTC, comment #2: |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Tue 06 Mar 2007 08:30:22 AM UTC, comment #1: This is rather old...
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Tue 01 Apr 2003 12:31:48 PM UTC, original submission:
In order to support referencing payload buffers in pbuf, safety checks are needed. The proposal is to follow the
|
Leon Woestenberg <likewise> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 3 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007-03-26 | kieranm | Status | None | Fixed | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2007-03-06 | goldsimon | Carbon-Copy | - | Added -email is unavailable- |
Powered by Savane 3.13-caa5.
Corresponding source code
I think that PBUF_REF was probable not implemented at the time of Marc Wells's email, and it happened as a result. Certainly sounds like his PBUF_EXT type is very similar to PBUF_REF. I'm happy to close this as done already, but please reopen if others disagree.