lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Bugs: bug #43095, IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Protocol ...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #43095: IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Protocol need to be change
| Submitter: | 任海波 <hichard> | ||
| Submitted: | Thu 28 Aug 2014 02:10:13 AM UTC | ||
| Category: | IPv6 | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
| Item Group: | Change Request | Status: | Fixed |
| Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | idelamer |
| Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
| lwIP version: | CVS Head | ||
Jump to the original submission
|
Wed 18 Mar 2015 07:22:37 PM UTC, comment #7: |
Ivan Delamer <idelamer> |
|
Wed 03 Sep 2014 05:05:07 PM UTC, comment #6: Thank you Hichard for posting, and thank you Simon for converting to patch (hichard: you just posted your code, not the diff).
|
Ivan Delamer <idelamer> |
|
Wed 03 Sep 2014 05:54:28 AM UTC, comment #5: File #32017 is not really a patch. I modified that file to create a real patch. I haven't separated the length fix from the rest that's in there though ('#if LWIP_RPL' as well as the function 'nd6_neighbor_cach_add' which does not seem to be used anywhere) |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
|
Wed 03 Sep 2014 01:44:40 AM UTC, comment #4: Hello Ivan:
|
任海波 <hichard> |
|
Tue 02 Sep 2014 07:05:50 PM UTC, comment #3: I don't think it's a duplicate, I think the concern is that the link-layer address option can take a variable number of bytes in a packet, usually 8 but sometimes 16. If NETIF_MAX_HWADDR_LEN = 6 then sometimes we only check for length 8 bytes fitting in a pbuf. It is really all that we would use, a longer address wouldn't match the network interface.
|
Ivan Delamer <idelamer> |
|
Tue 02 Sep 2014 06:19:25 PM UTC, comment #2:
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
|
Thu 28 Aug 2014 04:23:54 PM UTC, comment #1: I accidentally deleted your attachment, but could you re-upload it as a patch?
|
Ivan Delamer <idelamer> |
|
Thu 28 Aug 2014 02:10:13 AM UTC, original submission:
Hello Ivan:
|
任海波 <hichard> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 10 latest changes.
| Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-03-18 | idelamer | Status | Confirmed | Fixed | |
| Assigned to | None | idelamer | |||
| Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
| 2014-09-03 | idelamer | Status | Works For Me | Confirmed | |
| 2014-09-03 | goldsimon | Attached File | - | Added nd6_bug43095.patch, #32018 | |
| 2014-09-03 | hichard | Attached File | - | Added nd6_new.patch, #32017 | |
| 2014-09-02 | goldsimon | Status | None | Works For Me | |
| 2014-08-28 | idelamer | Attached File | #31987 | Removed | |
| 2014-08-28 | hichard | Attached File | - | Added nd6.c, #31987 | |
| Carbon-Copy | - | Added ivan |
Powered by Savane 3.12.
Corresponding source code

This is now fixed. thanks for reporting.
The extra function for adding cache entries will come at a later time, as some conditional hook.