lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Bugs: bug #45159, Is this part of do_writemore() in...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #45159: Is this part of do_writemore() in api_msg.c correct?
| Submitter: | Roberto Barbieri Carrera <sebulain> | ||
| Submitted: | Thu 21 May 2015 09:23:53 AM UTC | ||
| Category: | TCP | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
| Item Group: | None | Status: | Invalid |
| Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | None |
| Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
| lwIP version: | 1.4.1 | ||
|
Thu 21 May 2015 02:12:56 PM UTC, comment #5: |
Roberto Barbieri Carrera <sebulain> |
|
Thu 21 May 2015 02:11:23 PM UTC, comment #4:
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
|
Thu 21 May 2015 01:59:07 PM UTC, comment #3: Sorry, I meant
|
Roberto Barbieri Carrera <sebulain> |
|
Thu 21 May 2015 01:57:35 PM UTC, comment #2: Yes, but len could be three things:
|
Roberto Barbieri Carrera <sebulain> |
|
Thu 21 May 2015 01:50:13 PM UTC, comment #1: The idea behind this line is that a non-blocking write should never block, so it will call "do_writemore" only once. That in turn means that write_offset will always be zero. |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
|
Thu 21 May 2015 09:23:53 AM UTC, original submission:
Hello
|
Roberto Barbieri Carrera <sebulain> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 2 latest changes.
| Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-05-21 | goldsimon | Status | None | Invalid | |
| Open/Closed | Open | Closed |
Powered by Savane 3.12.
Corresponding source code

Sure, thanks.
Kind regards,
Roberto Barbieri Carrera
Archwave AG