lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Tasks: task #14176, Make mbox depth configurable
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #14176: Make mbox depth configurable
Submitter: | Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> | ||
Submitted: | Mon 10 Oct 2016 08:07:43 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Should Start On: | Mon 10 Oct 2016 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Should be Finished on: | Mon 10 Oct 2016 12:00:00 AM UTC | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | Cancelled | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Percent Complete: | 0% |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
Effort: | 0.00 |
Mon 13 Feb 2017 07:35:31 AM UTC, comment #2: |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Sat 11 Feb 2017 09:06:33 PM UTC, comment #1: Is this correct?
|
Dirk Ziegelmeier <dziegel> |
Mon 10 Oct 2016 08:07:43 AM UTC, original submission:
Currently, netconn mboxes (both recvmbox and acceptmbox) and tcpip_thread's mbox have the same size. This should be configurable. |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 2 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-02-13 | goldsimon | Status | None | Cancelled | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed |
Powered by Savane 3.13-02a9.
Corresponding source code
Seems like I didn't write it in the original submission, but would it make sense to set this per netconn? We have SO_RCVBUF, but that sets the number of bytes, not the buffers.
In the end, we probably don't have a decent mechanism to control this for sockets, so let's drop it until someone really needs it...