lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Tasks: task #7252, Create sys_thread_new_ex()
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #7252: Create sys_thread_new_ex()
Submitter: | Bill Florac <bflorac> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 28 Aug 2007 06:04:58 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Should Start On: | Tue 28 Aug 2007 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Should be Finished on: | Fri 28 Sep 2007 12:00:00 AM UTC | Priority: | 3 - Low |
Status: | None | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | fbernon | Percent Complete: | 100% |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | 1.3.0 |
Effort: | 0.00 |
Jump to the original submission
Wed 05 Sep 2007 04:50:21 PM UTC, comment #13: |
Frédéric Bernon <fbernon> |
Wed 05 Sep 2007 04:16:21 PM UTC, comment #12: Ok, patch is check in, sys_arch.txt is updated. I will update ports this evening. |
Frédéric Bernon <fbernon> |
Wed 05 Sep 2007 02:22:25 PM UTC, comment #11: I bow to the consensus! Fine by me. |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Tue 04 Sep 2007 06:26:33 PM UTC, comment #10: Looks OK.. |
Bill Florac <bflorac> |
Tue 04 Sep 2007 05:18:26 PM UTC, comment #9: I will also update sys_arch.txt if it's good.
|
Frédéric Bernon <fbernon> |
Tue 04 Sep 2007 05:17:13 PM UTC, comment #8: Patch file is attached, based on the current consensus (change directly sys_thread_new). Of course, I don't forget there is also contrib ports to update (but I will do it only when we will check in this one). Comments?
|
Frédéric Bernon <fbernon> |
Tue 04 Sep 2007 04:12:55 PM UTC, comment #7: Just to chip in with my view, since Frederic asked me to on IRC :-).
|
Jonathan Larmour <jifl> |
Wed 29 Aug 2007 04:30:38 PM UTC, comment #6:
|
Jared Grubb <jgrubb> |
Wed 29 Aug 2007 04:17:57 PM UTC, comment #5:
|
Jared Grubb <jgrubb> |
Wed 29 Aug 2007 08:56:31 AM UTC, comment #4: Given that we can do this in a backwardly compatible way, I'm not in a hurry to get this in for 1.3.0, but have no objections to it in the longer term as there is clearly a demand for this. |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Wed 29 Aug 2007 07:40:42 AM UTC, comment #3: For the same reasons than Bill and David, I'm ok with such change, except some details.
|
Frédéric Bernon <fbernon> |
Tue 28 Aug 2007 10:35:59 PM UTC, comment #2: I like this idea. It will map nicely onto my home grown OS's thread creation calls, which expect a process name and stack size.
|
David Empson <dempson> |
Tue 28 Aug 2007 07:34:56 PM UTC, comment #1: Some more details:
|
Bill Florac <bflorac> |
Tue 28 Aug 2007 06:04:58 AM UTC, original submission:
Create a new extended function, sys_thread_new_ex() with addional parameters.
|
Bill Florac <bflorac> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 7 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007-09-05 | fbernon | Percent Complete | 50% | 100% | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2007-09-05 | kieranm | Planned Release | None | 1.3.0 | |
2007-09-04 | fbernon | Attached File | - | Added sys_thread_new.patch, #13877 | |
Percent Complete | 0% | 50% | |||
Assigned to | None | fbernon | |||
2007-08-29 | kieranm | Priority | 5 - Normal | 3 - Low |
Powered by Savane 3.13-02a9.
Corresponding source code
Ok, contrib folder is updated (even "old"). Some @todo are integrated to do some suggestions to port maintainers.
So, I close this task, be reopen if I miss something.