lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Patches: patch #6410, Correlation between TCP MSS and...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #6410: Correlation between TCP MSS and netif MTU
Submitter: | Marc Chaland <chaland> | ||
Submitted: | Thu 07 Feb 2008 01:35:41 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | Works For Me | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | jifl | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Planned Release: | None |
Tue 04 Mar 2008 03:38:35 PM UTC, comment #5: |
Jonathan Larmour <jifl> |
Tue 04 Mar 2008 01:16:28 PM UTC, comment #4: Just to clarify the status of this: as I understand the other comments TCP_CALCULATE_EFF_SEND_MSS does what was requested, and any remaining issues are covered by BUG22249. Is that correct? If so we can close this |
Kieran Mansley <kieranm> |
Sun 10 Feb 2008 11:58:02 AM UTC, comment #3: Yes, that's it. Thank you for information. Just a remark linked with bug #22249 : MSS should be limited to a minimal size.
|
Marc Chaland <chaland> |
Fri 08 Feb 2008 04:07:03 PM UTC, comment #2: Marc, have you enabled TCP_CALCULATE_EFF_SEND_MSS in lwipopts.h? It seems this does what you want.
|
Jonathan Larmour <jifl> |
Thu 07 Feb 2008 01:39:13 PM UTC, comment #1: Sorry, I forgot :
|
Marc Chaland <chaland> |
Thu 07 Feb 2008 01:35:41 PM UTC, original submission:
When client tries to connect to lwip on one interface with a reduced MTU, MSS is not reduced.
|
Marc Chaland <chaland> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 3 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008-03-04 | jifl | Status | None | Works For Me | |
Assigned to | None | jifl | |||
Open/Closed | Open | Closed |
Powered by Savane 3.13-4448.
Corresponding source code
Yes. Looks like we can indeed close it.