lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack - Tasks: task #13512, check how IPv6 handles the...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #13512: check how IPv6 handles the "no address" case for routing
Submitter: | Sylvain Rochet <gradator> | ||
Submitted: | Sat 07 Mar 2015 07:35:30 PM UTC | ||
Category: | IPv6 | Should Start On: | Sat 07 Mar 2015 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Should be Finished on: | Sat 07 Mar 2015 12:00:00 AM UTC | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | Done | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | goldsimon | Percent Complete: | 100% |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Planned Release: | None |
Effort: | 0.00 |
Jump to the original submission
Fri 20 Mar 2015 08:05:33 PM UTC, comment #10: |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Wed 18 Mar 2015 08:14:59 PM UTC, comment #9: So I'm pretty sure that with the current ip6_route() and ip6_select_source_address() we should have the expected results.
|
Ivan Delamer <idelamer> |
Tue 10 Mar 2015 07:51:22 PM UTC, comment #8: I'll attach a diff of how I would solve this. |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Tue 10 Mar 2015 07:21:37 PM UTC, comment #7: Is this a matter of RFC conformance? I thought it was just about integrating our internal netif states (potentially down/no link) into what the RFC says about routing? |
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Tue 10 Mar 2015 07:11:33 PM UTC, comment #6: I remember when I implemented this I was following RFC but I'll double check it for non-LL addresses. |
Ivan Delamer <idelamer> |
Mon 09 Mar 2015 08:22:18 PM UTC, comment #5:
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Mon 09 Mar 2015 07:09:11 PM UTC, comment #4:
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Mon 09 Mar 2015 04:43:47 PM UTC, comment #3: There should always be a LL address configured, and possibly a routable address as well.
|
Ivan Delamer <idelamer> |
Sat 07 Mar 2015 07:55:45 PM UTC, comment #2: yes, link-local are not routable at all, we should actually only check routable addresses. |
Sylvain Rochet <gradator> |
Sat 07 Mar 2015 07:43:02 PM UTC, comment #1: I'm just looking at ip6_route() (in the context of bug #43904 -ip_route() and ip6_route() must detect linkup status).
|
Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon> |
Sat 07 Mar 2015 07:35:30 PM UTC, original submission:
IPv6 routing should not select a netif that has no IP address
|
Sylvain Rochet <gradator> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 5 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015-03-20 | goldsimon | Status | None | Done | |
Percent Complete | 0% | 100% | |||
Assigned to | None | goldsimon | |||
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2015-03-10 | goldsimon | Attached File | - | Added task13512_ip6route_check_up_and_link.diff, #33306 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-caa5.
Corresponding source code
Yep, thanks for clarification.